ReviewDrugs1999
Cost effectiveness of quinolones in hospitals and the community.
Review in Drugs, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.PharmacoEconomics · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In hospitals, oral quinolone therapy has lower daily associated costs (acquisition and administration) than most intravenous regimens. In addition, oral switch therapy shortens the duration of hospital stay for most patients. However, randomised trials are required to measure the economic impact of the switch to oral therapy in terms of hospital care costs and the burden imposed on community health services, on relatives or carers and on the patient. Evidence about the reliability of absorption of quinolones in hospitalised patients is more likely to be obtained from large population kinetic studies than randomised effectiveness trials. The existing literature on cost effectiveness of quinolones in the community is disappointing. The principal problems are poor definition of diagnostic criteria, inclusion of irrelevant comparator drugs and a failure to include infections caused by bacteria that are resistant to the comparator. Consequently, there is little evidence to support the use of economic models to determine the consequences of antibiotic resistance in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.