ArticleThe American journal of pathology1999
Mechanical forces induce scar remodeling. Study in non-pressure-treated versus pressure-treated hypertrophic scars.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Mechanical force-induced tissue remodelling in a clinically relevant microphysiological model of asthmatic human lungs.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Internal stent angle as a risk factor for jejunal penetration after pancreaticoduodenectomy: The efficacy of a modified insertion technique.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pressure-enhanced scar patch in a rabbit ear hypertrophic scar model.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Low-fatigue, adjustable pressure garments at 10, 20 and 30 mm Hg reduce scar thickness and improve pliability.PloS one · 2026Article
- Bayesian Inference Framework to Identify Skin Material PropertiesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Electrospun Biomaterials for Scarless Acne Wound Healing: Advances and Prospects.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Effect of internal pancreatic duct stent on reducing long-term pancreaticojejunostomy stenosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- An Update on Molecular Mechanisms of Scarring-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Current and Future Developments in Wound Healing.Facial plastic surgery : FPS · 2023Article
- Mechanoresponsive regulation of fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition in three-dimensional tissue analogues: mechanical strain amplitude dependency of fibrosis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Modulating Cellular Responses to Mechanical Forces to Promote Wound Regeneration.Advances in wound care · 2022Review
- Article
- Assessment of long-term results of repeated dilations and impact of a scheduled program of dilations for refractory esophageal strictures: a retrospective case-control study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Skin biomechanics: a potential therapeutic intervention target to reduce scarring.Burns & trauma · 2022Review
- Mechanobiological Principles Influence the Immune Response in Regeneration: Implications for Bone Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Autologous Fat Transfer for Scar Prevention and Remodeling: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- RNA-seq-based analysis of the hypertrophic scarring with and without pressure therapy in a Bama minipig model.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Flat Incision Technique for Reconstructive Brow Surgery: A Wound Healing Model and Clinical Evaluation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018Article
- Scar formation following excisional and burn injuries in a red Duroc pig model.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reparative process of second and third degree burns usually results in hypertrophic scar formation that can be treated by pressure. Although this method is efficient, its mechanisms of action are not known. In this work, we have studied the histological organization of hypertrophic scars submitted to pressure. Skin biopsies were performed 2 to 7 months after the onset of treatment in two adjacent regions of the scar, non-pressure- or pressure-treated and analyzed by immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy for extracellular matrix organization and cellular morphology. In non-pressure-treated regions, fibrillin deposits did not present the classical candelabra-like pattern under epidermis and were reduced in dermis; in pressure-treated regions the amount was increased compared to non-pressure-treated regions but the organization was still disturbed. In non-pressure-treated regions, elastin was present in patch deposits; in pressure-treated regions elastin formed fibers, smaller than in normal dermis. Tenascin was present in the whole dermis in non-pressure-treated regions, whereas in pressure-treated regions it was observed only under epidermis and around vessels, as in normal skin. alpha-Smooth muscle actin-expressing myofibroblasts were absent in normal skin, present in large amounts in non-pressure-treated regions, and almost absent in pressure-treated regions. The disturbed ultrastructural organization of dermal-epidermal junction observed in non-pressure-treated regions disappeared after pressure therapy; typical features of apoptosis in fibroblastic cells and morphological aspects of collagen degradation were observed in pressure-treated regions. Our results show that, in hypertrophic scars, pressure therapy restores in part the extracellular matrix organization observed in normal scar and induces the disappearance of alpha-smooth muscle actin-expressing myofibroblasts, probably by apoptosis. We suggest that the pressure acts by accelerating the remission phase of the postburn reparative process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.