Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10545143›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1999

Comparison of the effects of divalent cations on the noradrenaline-evoked cation current in rabbit portal vein smooth muscle cells.

A S Aromolaran, W A Large

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A S AromolaranDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE, UK.
W A Large
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The facilitatory effects of external Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+ (Ca2+o, Sr2+o and Ba2+o) on the noradrenaline-evoked non-selective cation current (Icat) were compared in rabbit portal vein smooth muscle cells using patch pipette techniques. 2. All divalent cations tested potentiated the amplitude of Icat and the potency sequence was Ca2+o > Sr2+o > Ba2+o. Ca2+o and Sr2+o increased the amplitude of Icat by about eight times whereas Ba2+o produced only a threefold facilitation. 3. The current-voltage relationship of Icat was not changed by Ca2+o, Sr2+o or Ba2+o. 4. From noise analysis the single channel conductance (gamma) was approximately 10 pS in divalent cation-free solution but was about 20 pS with Ca2+o, Sr2+o and Ba2+o. 5. From noise and voltage-jump experiments it was apparent that at least three kinetically resolvable channel states are associated with Icat in divalent cation-free solution. Ca2+o and Sr2+o produced marked changes in the characteristics of the power spectrum and relaxations of Icat in response to voltage steps, consistent with a shift in the equilibrium between the channel states, whereas Ba2+o produced minimal effects. 6. The data show that Ca2+o, Sr2+o and Ba2+o increase the amplitude of Icat, which results in part from an increase in the single channel conductance. In addition the results suggest that Ca2+o and Sr2+o alter the kinetic behaviour of the single channels whereas Ba2+o has little effect on the equilibrium between the channel states.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtifactsBariumCalciumCationsCations, DivalentElectric ConductivityElectrophysiologyFemaleMuscle, Smooth, VascularNorepinephrinePortal VeinRabbitsStrontiumBariumCalciumCationsCations, DivalentNorepinephrineStrontium

Identifiers

PMID10545143
PMCPMC2269615
OpenAlexW1987123380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.