Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10541557›Full record

ArticleGenes & development1999

A large-scale insertional mutagenesis screen in zebrafish.

A Amsterdam, S Burgess, G Golling, W Chen, Z Sun, K Townsend, S Farrington, M Haldi, N Hopkins

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 493 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Piezo3 is a novel mechanosensitive Piezo ion channel in vertebrates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of two-pore domain potassium channels and their gene expression in zebrafish embryos.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Scalable CRISPR Screens in Zebrafish Using MIC-Drop.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A AmsterdamBiology Department and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
S Burgess
G Golling
W Chen
Z Sun
K Townsend
S Farrington
M Haldi
N Hopkins
Center for Cancer Research · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Function of Ruvbl1-Ruvbl2 in dynein arm assembly in motile ciliated epithelial cellsR01HL175156 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAOXIA SUN · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL175156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that approximately 2500 genes are essential for the normal development of a zebrafish embryo. A mutation in any one of these genes can result in a visible developmental defect, usually followed by the death of the embryo or larva by days 5-7 of age. We are performing a large-scale insertional mutagenesis screen in the zebrafish with the goal of isolating approximately 1000 embryonic mutations. We plan to clone a significant fraction of the mutated genes, as these are the genes important for normal embryogenesis of a vertebrate. To achieve this goal, we prepared approximately 36, 000 founder fish by injecting blastula-stage embryos with one of two pseudotyped retroviruses. We estimate that together these fish harbor between 500,000-1,000,000 proviral insertions in their germ lines. The protocol we have devised and the size of our facility allow us to breed approximately 80,000-150,000 of these insertions to homozygosity within 2 years. Because a pilot screen conducted earlier in our laboratory revealed that the frequency of mutations obtained with this type of insertional mutagen is 1 embryonic lethal mutation per 70-100 proviral insertions, screening 100,000 insertions should yield at least 1000 mutants. Here we describe the protocol for the screen and initial results with the first of the two retroviral vectors used, a virus designated F(5). We screened an estimated 760 insertions among F(3) progeny from 92 F(2) families and obtained 9 recessive embryonic lethal mutations. Thus, the efficiency of mutagenesis with this viral vector is approximately one-ninth that observed with the chemical mutagen ENU in zebrafish. We have also obtained two dominant mutations, one of which is described here. As expected, mutated genes can be readily identified. So far, genes mutated in four of the nine recessive mutants and one of the two dominant mutants have been cloned. Further improvements to this technology could make large-scale insertional mutagenesis screening and rapid gene cloning accessible to relatively small zebrafish laboratories.

Indexed as

Mutagenesis, InsertionalAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularDNA PrimersFemaleGenes, DominantGenes, LethalGenes, RecessiveGenetic TestingMaleMutationPhenotypeProvirusesZebrafishDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID10541557
PMCPMC317115
OpenAlexW2132531056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.