Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10540789›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science

Tonic and phasic activity in smooth muscle.

K D Thornbury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Low-voltage-activated ("T-Type") calcium channels in review.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

K D ThornburySmooth Muscle Group, Queen's University of Belfast.
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have studied the electrical and mechanical behaviour of two very different smooth muscle preparations, mesenteric lymphatic ducts and proximal urethra. These tissues generate different patterns of spontaneous contraction adapted to fulfil their contrasting functions. While lymphatics undergo regular phasic contractions and relaxations, suited to their role in propelling lymph, the urethra remains in a state of contracture to maintain urinary continence. The challenge is to understand how both of these achieve their respective roles. Interestingly, electrical activity of lymphatics resembles that in the heart in having a one to one relationship between the action potential and phasic contraction. Patch clamp studies have shown that lymphatic cells express 3 ionic currents that are not present in urethral cells, but are shared with cardiac muscle. These are, i) fast Na+ current, ii) T-type Ca2+ current and iii) a hyperpolarization-activated cation current, Ir. The fast Na+ current is ideally suited to the propagation of the action potential over large distances, as required by a vessel capable of generating a rapid well co-ordinated contraction along its length. The T-current and Ir, on the other hand, appear to be involved in electrical pacemaking as they are in the heart. The urethra does not usually undergo regular phasic contractions and it lacks these currents. Instead, urethral tone may depend on an interaction between L-type Ca2+ current and a large Ca(2+)-activated Cl- current. Activation of Cl- channels (perhaps by spontaneous release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores) would depolarize the membrane potential to within the 'window current' range for L-type Ca2+ channels and result in Ca2+ influx and contraction. This process may be maintained for a time by positive feedback whereby the influx of Ca2+ continues to activate the Cl- channels.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsHumansLymphatic SystemMuscle, SmoothUrethra

Identifiers

PMID10540789
OpenAlexW2010685650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.