ArticlePharmacoEconomics1999
Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perampanel for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Pooled it
- Economic Studies in Motor Neurone Disease: A Systematic Methodological Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Survival in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regimens with CHOP.British journal of cancer · 2001Pooled it
- The effects of dexpramipexole (KNS-760704) in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Nature medicine · 2011Trial
- A computational combinatorial approach identifies a protein inhibitor of superoxide dismutase 1 misfolding, aggregation, and cytotoxicity.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Mortality, health, social and economic consequences of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a controlled national study.Journal of neurology · 2013Article
- Event-free survival and cost-effectiveness in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first remission treated with allogeneic transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2007Article
- Cost effectiveness of treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of the literature.PharmacoEconomics · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, long term treatment with riluzole has been reported to improve survival or tracheostomy-free survival in comparison with placebo. We conducted a pharmacoeconomic analysis for estimating the cost per life-year gained using this drug.
designThis study was an incremental cost-effectiveness lifetime analysis.
settingThe clinical material was derived from 2 placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials comparing riluzole versus usual care without riluzole, which were identified through a literature search based on the IOWA and the Medline systems. PATIENTS AND
interventionsThe study included 633 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Patient-level information was retrieved from 313 patients treated with riluzole and 320 patients assigned to placebo. Survival after randomisation was compared between the 2 groups using standard statistics (log-rank test and Cox analysis), whereas the lifetime survival gain was estimated using Gompertz extrapolation. Cost data relative to the expenditure for healthcare resources were obtained from published information (using the US average wholesale price for the acquisition cost of riluzole). Sensitivity testing assessed the impact of different cost-of-illness assumptions for treated and untreated patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
resultsOur primary analysis showed that treatment with riluzole significantly prolonged survival [death risk = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 0.96; p = 0.022]. The lifetime survival gain (including 3% annual discounting) was, on average, 2.3 months per patient, while the incremental cost was around $US12,000 per patient. Hence, the cost-effectiveness ratio of riluzole versus usual care without riluzole was $US62,609 per life-year gained (discounted dollars per discounted years; 95% CI: $US13,458 to $US205,714). The sensitivity analysis, considering different values of national cost for riluzole, suggested an interval for this parameter ranging from $US45,048 to $US62,609.
conclusionsOur study indicates that in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, riluzole has an unfavourable cost-effectiveness ratio or, at best, a borderline pharmacoeconomic profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.