Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10538331›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1999

Costs of diabetes. A methodological analysis of the literature.

E Pagano, M Brunetti, F Tediosi, L Garattini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Methods for Estimating Avoidable Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Economic menace of diabetes in India: a systematic review.International journal of diabetes in developing countries · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cost of diabetic eye, renal and foot complications: a methodological review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. The cost of Type 1 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom: a review of cost-of-illness studies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Treatment cost for typhoid fever at two hospitals in Kolkata, India.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Direct medical costs unequivocally related to diabetes in Italian specialized centers.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2004
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E PaganoCenter for Health Economics CESAV, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy.
M Brunetti
F Tediosi
L Garattini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review studies on the costs of diabetes and its complications through a scheme designed specifically for assessing the quality of cost-of-illness (COI) studies. DESIGN AND

settingThe methodology of COI studies in diabetes was analysed in order to assess the significance of quantitative results. The scheme adopted 7 items identified as the main points for discussing the methodological choices governing the results. We also used a checklist based on questions related to the 7 items. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND

resultsThe answers showed that many studies appear not to give technical details, so it is hard to understand the method. Methodological choices varied widely between the studies. This is probably due to the lack of consensus on the methodology of COI studies. Based on the findings of this review, we suggest also some specific points that could help produce more reliable results on the costs of diabetes.

conclusionsClearly, a general consensus on COI studies is still remote, making the value of any comparison of results questionable.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessCosts and Cost AnalysisDiabetes MellitusHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.