Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10537429›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics1999

Primary care purchasing. Are integrated primary care provider/purchasers the way forward?

S Peckham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S PeckhamFaculty of Health and Social Care, University of the West of England, Bristol, England. Stephen.Peckham@uwe.ac.uk
University of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated primary care provider/purchaser organisations are currently being developed in the UK and other countries. In common with many other European countries and New Zealand, there has been a swing away from market-orientated models of healthcare organisation towards models which blend centralised planning and quasi market approaches. Primary care groups in the UK and independent practice organisations in New Zealand provide new opportunities to combine micromanagement techniques in the delivery of patient care and approaches to improving population health. These new organisations are building on the experience of health maintenance organisations (HMOs) in the US and physician-led purchasing in the UK and other countries. However, there are distinct differences between countries due to differences in health and social care systems and the degree of emphasis on primary physician involvement. Moreover, the continuing emphasis on a physician-led medical model may be at odds with developing a public health approach which emphasises participative and collaboration with local populations and other primary care providers--an area where physicians have little experience.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedFamily PracticeHumansNew ZealandPrimary Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID10537429
OpenAlexW2019981248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.