ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1999
Atom density in protein structures.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein structure prediction using residue- and fragment-environment potentials in CASP11.Proteins · 2016Article
- Detecting local residue environment similarity for recognizing near-native structure models.Proteins · 2014Article
- Long-range electron tunneling.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2014Article
- Electropositive charge in alpha-defensin bactericidal activity: functional effects of Lys-for-Arg substitutions vary with the peptide primary structure.Infection and immunity · 2009Article
- Accessibility and partner number of protein residues, their relationship and a webserver, ContPlot for their display.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Statistical analysis of physical-chemical properties and prediction of protein-protein interfaces.Journal of molecular modeling · 2007Article
- Measures of residue density in protein structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The residue environment in protein structures is studied with respect to the density of carbon (C), oxygen (O), and nitrogen (N) atoms within a certain distance (say 5 A) of each residue. Two types of environments are evaluated: one based on side-chain atom contacts (abbreviated S-S) and the other based on all atom (side-chain + backbone) contacts (abbreviated A-A). Different atom counts are observed about nine-residue structural categories defined by three solvent accessibility levels and three secondary structure states. Among the structural categories, the S-S atom count ratios generally vary more than the A-A atom count ratios because of the fact that the backbone (O) and (N) atoms contribute equal counts. Secondary structure affects the (C) density for the A-A contacts whereas secondary structure has little influence on the (C) density for the S-S contacts. For S-S contacts, a greater density of (O) over (N) atom neighbors stands out in the environment of most amino acid types. By contrast, for A-A contacts, independent of the solvent accessibility levels, the ratio (O)/(N) is approximately 1 in helical states, consistent with the geometry of alpha-helical residues whose side-chains tilt oppositely to the amino to carboxy alpha-helical axis. The highest ratio of neighbor (O)/(N) is achieved under solvent exposed conditions. This (O) vs. (N) prevalence is advantageous at the protein surface that generally exhibits an acid excess that helps to enhance protein solubility in the cell and to avoid nonspecific interactions with phosphate groups of DNA, RNA, and other plasma constituents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.