Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10531618›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1999

Z-line structural diversity in frog single muscle fiber in the passive state.

M Yamaguchi, G A Fuller, W Klomkleaw, S Yamano, T Oba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Large-scale models reveal the two-component mechanics of striated muscle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M YamaguchiDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA. yamaguchi.1@postbox.acs.ohio-state.edu
G A Fuller
W Klomkleaw
S Yamano
T Oba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural changes of the Z-line between small square net (ss) and basket weave (bw) cross-sectional patterns were examined using intact single fibers and mechanically skinned fibers in the passive state to determine if the pattern is related to the sarcomere length (SL) and if the pattern undergoes a reversible transition in low- and high-osmotic medium. Frog single fibers were isolated from the anterior tibial muscle in Ringer's solution. Entirely or partially skinned single fibers were prepared in relaxing solution (also called low-osmotic medium). The high osmotic medium contained 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in relaxing solution. The sarcomere length (SL) of each fiber was measured directly by use of a laser beam or indirectly from electron micrographs with use of a correction factor. The ss and bw forms in cross sections were quantified by analysis of electron micrographs. The results show that the structural change of Z-line occurs around bw << 2.3-2.4 microns << ss (n = 25) and bw << 3.1-3.2 microns << ss (n = 13) in intact single fibers and skinned fibers, respectively. With the quick freeze-freeze substitution method, an intact single fiber with a SL of 2.35 microns showed almost 100% of ss form. The structural transition in cross section was also confirmed in four partially skinned fibers, where patterns went from mostly ss form (intact portion) to mostly bw form (skinned portion) at the SL between 2.40 to 3.20 microns. The reversibility of the change between ss and bw was proved by using low- and high-osmotic medium. The transition and reversion of cross-sectional patterns both occur in the passive state.

Indexed as

AnimalsMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalPhysical StimulationRana temporaria

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.