ReviewPlant molecular biology1999
LINEs, SINEs and repetitive DNA: non-LTR retrotransposons in plant genomes.
Review in Plant molecular biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the Choice of Sequences for Molecular Plant Taxonomy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Guideline
- Genomic characterization of repetitive DNA and transposable elements in Dyckia (Pitcairnioideae) species.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Haplotype-resolved genome ofHorticulture research · 2024Article
- The nature and genomic landscape of repetitive DNA classes in Chrysanthemum nankingense shows recent genomic changes.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Identification of Putative Markers of Non-infectious Bud Failure in Almond [Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- A sensitive repeat identification framework based on short and long reads.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Twenty years of transposable element analysis in theMobile DNA · 2020Review
- Centromeres of Cucumis melo L. comprise Cmcent and two novel repeats, CmSat162 and CmSat189.PloS one · 2020Article
- siRNAs regulate DNA methylation and interfere with gene and lncRNA expression in the heterozygous polyploid switchgrass.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2018Article
- Subgenome Dominance in an Interspecific Hybrid, Synthetic Allopolyploid, and a 140-Year-Old Naturally Established Neo-Allopolyploid Monkeyflower.The Plant cell · 2017Article
- Article
- A small RNA mediated regulation of a stress-activated retrotransposon and the tissue specific transposition during the reproductive period in Arabidopsis.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
- Physiology of the read-write genome.The Journal of physiology · 2014Review
- Unique features of the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) megagenome revealed through sequence annotation.Genetics · 2014Article
- Identification, characterization and distribution of transposable elements in the flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) genome.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Development and application of SINE-based markers for genotyping of potato varieties.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2012Article
- Characterizing the walnut genome through analyses of BAC end sequences.Plant molecular biology · 2012Article
- Structure of the acyl-glucose-dependent anthocyanin 5-O-glucosyltransferase gene in carnations and its disruption by transposable elements in some varieties.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2011Article
- A physical map for the Amborella trichopoda genome sheds light on the evolution of angiosperm genome structure.Genome biology · 2011Article
- Repetitive part of the banana (Musa acuminata) genome investigated by low-depth 454 sequencing.BMC plant biology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroelements and remnants thereof constitute a large fraction of the repetitive DNA of plant genomes. They include LTR (long terminal repeat) retrotransposons such as Ty1-copia and Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons, which are widespread in plant genomes and show structural similarity to retroviruses. Recently, non-LTR retrotransposons, lacking the long terminal repeats and subdivided into LINEs (long interspersed nuclear elements) and SINEs (short interspersed nuclear elements), have been discovered as ubiquitous components of nuclear genomes in many species across the plant kingdom. LINEs are probably the most ancient class of retrotransposons in plant genomes, but the evolutionary borders between non-LTR retrotransposons, LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses are indistinct as shown by the detection of intermediate forms in other eukaryotic taxa. Transposition of non-LTR retrotransposons is only rarely observed in plants indicating that the majority of these retroelements are inactive and/or under regulation of the host genome. Transposition is poorly understood, but experimental evidence from other genetic systems, in particular from insect and mammalian species, shows that LINEs are able to transpose autonomously, while non-autonomous SINEs depend on the reverse transcription machinery of other retrotransposons. Fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated that different classes of retrotransposons differ largely in their chromosomal organization and are often excluded from blocks of rapidly homogenizing tandem repeats. In particular, LINEs contribute considerably to the repetitive DNA of nuclear plant genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.