Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10523551›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999

Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains.

B Shopsin, M Gomez, S O Montgomery, D H Smith, M Waddington, D E Dodge, D A Bost, M Riehman, S Naidich, B N Kreiswirth

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 472 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
472citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

472 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Persistence of Biofilm-Forming and Multidrug-ResistantJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2026
    Article
  5. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Microbial and host innate immune factors affecting the persistence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  13. Heterogeneity ofIJID regions · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methicillin-resistantCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Mec-A Positive Methicillin-SusceptibleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

412 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B ShopsinPublic Health Research Institute, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016, USA.
M Gomez
S O Montgomery
D H Smith
M Waddington
D E Dodge
D A Bost
M Riehman
S Naidich
B N Kreiswirth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three hundred and twenty isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were typed by DNA sequence analysis of the X region of the protein A gene (spa). spa typing was compared to both phenotypic and molecular techniques for the ability to differentiate and categorize S. aureus strains into groups that correlate with epidemiological information. Two previously characterized study populations were examined. A collection of 59 isolates (F. C. Tenover, R. Arbeit, G. Archer, J. Biddle, S. Byrne, R. Goering, G. Hancock, G. A. Hébert, B. Hill, R. Hollis, W. R. Jarvis, B. Kreiswirth, W. Eisner, J. Maslow, L. K. McDougal, J. M. Miller, M. Mulligan, and M. A. Pfaller, J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:407-415, 1994) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was used to test for the ability to discriminate outbreak from epidemiologically unrelated strains. A separate collection of 261 isolates form a multicenter study (R. B. Roberts, A. de Lencastre, W. Eisner, E. P. Severina, B. Shopsin, B. N. Kreiswirth, and A. Tomasz, J. Infect. Dis. 178:164-171, 1998) of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in New York City (NYC) was used to compare the ability of spa typing to group strains along clonal lines to that of the combination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization. In the 320 isolates studied, spa typing identified 24 distinct repeat types and 33 different strain types. spa typing distinguished 27 of 29 related strains and did not provide a unique fingerprint for 4 unrelated strains from the four outbreaks of the CDC collection. In the NYC collection, spa typing provided a clonal assignment for 185 of 195 strains within the five major groups previously described. spa sequencing appears to be a highly effective rapid typing tool for S. aureus that, despite some expense of specificity, has significant advantages in terms of speed, ease of use, ease of interpretation, and standardization among laboratories.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesGenes, BacterialAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceCross InfectionDNA, BacterialEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMolecular EpidemiologyPhenotypePolymorphism, GeneticStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal Protein AStaphylococcus aureusUnited StatesDNA, BacterialStaphylococcal Protein A

Identifiers

PMID10523551
PMCPMC85690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.