Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10523542›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1999

Improved multiplex PCR using conserved and species-specific 16S rRNA gene primers for simultaneous detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides forsythus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis.

S D Tran, J D Rudney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. qPCR assay optimisation for a clinical study comparing oral health risk in Rett syndrome.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma againstInternational journal of dentistry · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S D TranDepartment of Oral Science, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J D Rudney
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Diversity supplementT32HD007014 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
IN VIVO STUDIES OF SALIVA ANTIMICROBIAL PROTEINSR01DE007233 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI RUDNEY, JOEL D. · 1991 to 2001
$403k
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN DENTAL CARIES RESEARCHT32DE007014 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SCHACHTELE, CHARLES F · 1985 to 1995
–
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007014NIDCR NIH HHS 2R01 DE07233NIDCR NIH HHS 2T32 DE07014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among putative periodontal pathogens, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides forsythus, and Porphyromonas gingivalis are most convincingly implicated as etiological agents in periodontitis. Therefore, techniques for detection of those three species would be of value. We previously published a description of a multiplex PCR that detects A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis. The present paper presents an improvement on that technique, which now allows more sensitive detection of all three periodontal pathogens. Sensitivity was determined by testing serial dilutions of A. actinomycetemcomitans, B. forsythus, and P. gingivalis cells. Primer specificity was tested against (i) all gene sequences from the GenBank-EMBL database, (ii) six A. actinomycetemcomitans, one B. forsythus, and four P. gingivalis strains, (iii) eight different species of oral bacteria, and (iv) supra- and subgingival plaque samples from 20 healthy subjects and subgingival plaque samples from 10 patients with periodontitis. The multiplex PCR had a detection limit of 10 A. actinomycetemcomitans, 10 P. gingivalis, and 100 B. forsythus cells. Specificity was confirmed by the fact that (i) none of our forward primers were homologous to the 16S rRNA genes of other oral species, (ii) amplicons of predicted size were detected for all A. actinomycetemcomitans, B. forsythus, and P. gingivalis strains tested, and (iii) no amplicons were detected for the eight other bacterial species. A. actinomycetemcomitans, B. forsythus, and P. gingivalis were detected in 6 of 20, 1 of 20, and 11 of 20 of supragingival plaque samples, respectively, and 4 of 20, 7 of 20, and 13 of 20 of subgingival plaque samples, respectively, from periodontally healthy subjects. Among patients with periodontitis, the organisms were detected in 7 of 10, 10 of 10, and 7 of 10 samples, respectively. The simultaneous detection of three periodontal pathogens is an advantage of this technique over conventional PCR assays.

Indexed as

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitansBacteroidesConserved SequenceDental PlaqueDNA PrimersEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansPeriodontitisPolymerase Chain ReactionPorphyromonas gingivalisRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySpecies SpecificityDNA PrimersRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID10523542
PMCPMC85679
OpenAlexW2013804682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.