ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999
On the role of 5-HT1B/1D receptors in modulating transmission in a spinal reflex pathway in the decerebrated rabbit.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraspinal Grafting of Serotonergic Neurons Modifies Expression of Genes Important for Functional Recovery in Paraplegic Rats.Neural plasticity · 2018Article
- Central 5-HT7 receptors are critical for reflex activation of cardiac vagal drive in anaesthetized rats.The Journal of physiology · 2005Article
- Pharmacological characterization of serotonin receptor subtypes modulating primary afferent input to deep dorsal horn neurons in the neonatal rat.British journal of pharmacology · 2001Article
- Effects of a selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist on spinal and trigeminal reflexes in the anaesthetized rabbit.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
1. In decerebrated rabbits, the selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127,935 had no significant effects on reflexes evoked in medial gastrocnemius motoneurones by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve, or on arterial blood pressure or heart rate when given by the intrathecal (up to 543 nmol cumulative) or intravenous (up to 1.8 micromol cumulative) routes. 2. In decerebrated, spinalized rabbits, intrathecal GR 127,935 in doses of up to 543 nmol, had no effect on the sural-gastrocnemius reflex. Furthermore, this drug failed to alter enhancement of the sural-gastrocnemius reflex induced by 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propyl)aminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), given at 300 nmol kg-1 i.v. 3. In decerebrated, spinalized rabbits, the selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists L-694,247 (cumulative doses of 2 - 243 nmol kg-1 i.v.) and L-741,604 (cumulative doses of 3 - 307 nmol kg-1 i.v.), each caused the sural-gastrocnemius reflex to increase to 140% of pre-drug levels, and arterial blood pressure to rise by about 10 mmHg. Subsequent administration of GR 127,935 at 0.9 - 1.8 micromol kg-1 reversed the pressor effect of the agonists but not the increase in reflexes. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100,635 (185 nmol kg-1 i.v.) also failed to reverse the increase in reflexes, but the 5-HT1B/1D/5-HT2/5-HT7 ligand ritanserin (1.6 micromol kg-1 i.v.) restored reflexes to pre-drug control values after L-741,604 (it was not tested against L-694,247). 4. These data indicate that 5-HT1B/1D receptors do not significantly modulate transmission in the sural-gastrocnemius reflex pathway, and that the enhancement of reflexes by 8-OH-DPAT and L-741,604 is probably mediated by 5-HT7 receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.