Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10516630›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999

Vasodilatation of intrapulmonary arteries to P2-receptor nucleotides in normal and pulmonary hypertensive newborn piglets.

M R McMillan, G Burnstock, S G Haworth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Purinergic Dysfunction in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ATP-induced vasodilation in human skeletal muscle.British journal of pharmacology · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

M R McMillanInstitute of Child Health, 30 Guildford Street, London WC1N 1EH.
G Burnstock
S G Haworth
Institute of Child Health · GRThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The vasodilator responses of isolated intrapulmonary arteries (IPA) to P2-receptor agonists were investigated during adaptation to extrauterine life in the piglet. The effect of pulmonary hypertension on the normal response was determined after exposing newborn animals to chronic hypobaric hypoxia (51 kPa) for 3 days. 2. Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), 2-methylthioATP (2-meSATP), adenosine 5-O-(2-thiodiphos-phate) (ADPbetaS) and uridine 5'-triphosphate (UTP) induced a relaxation in normal newborn piglet IPA pre-contracted with prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha). The relaxations were not affected by removal of the endothelium. The responses to ATP and ADPbetaS increased significantly with age. 3. The relaxation responses of IPA to ATP, 2-meSATP and ADPbetaS continued to increase normally after birth in an hypoxic environment. 4. The results of the study show that vasodilatation of porcine intrapulmonary vessels to nucleotides increased during development from foetus to adult; that the vasodilatation to purines was mediated by P2Y-receptors on the vascular smooth muscle rather than on the endothelium; and that the P2Y-receptor mediated relaxation of IPA remained normal in the pulmonary hypertensive neonate.

Indexed as

Adenine NucleotidesAnimalsAnimals, NewbornHypertension, PulmonaryOrgan Culture TechniquesPulmonary ArteryReceptors, Purinergic P2SwineUridine TriphosphateVasodilationAdenine NucleotidesReceptors, Purinergic P2Uridine Triphosphate

Identifiers

PMID10516630
PMCPMC1571658
OpenAlexW4251274485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.