Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10515900›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews1999

Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance.

M A Ghannoum, L B Rice

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 536 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
536citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

536 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,747 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  16. A review of the current anti-New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

476 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A GhannoumCenter for Medical Mycology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. MAG3@PO.CWRU.EDU
L B Rice
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased use of antibacterial and antifungal agents in recent years has resulted in the development of resistance to these drugs. The significant clinical implication of resistance has led to heightened interest in the study of antimicrobial resistance from different angles. Areas addressed include mechanisms underlying this resistance, improved methods to detect resistance when it occurs, alternate options for the treatment of infections caused by resistant organisms, and strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of resistance. In this review, the mode of action of antifungals and their mechanisms of resistance are discussed. Additionally, an attempt is made to discuss the correlation between fungal and bacterial resistance. Antifungals can be grouped into three classes based on their site of action: azoles, which inhibit the synthesis of ergosterol (the main fungal sterol); polyenes, which interact with fungal membrane sterols physicochemically; and 5-fluorocytosine, which inhibits macromolecular synthesis. Many different types of mechanisms contribute to the development of resistance to antifungals. These mechanisms include alteration in drug target, alteration in sterol biosynthesis, reduction in the intercellular concentration of target enzyme, and overexpression of the antifungal drug target. Although the comparison between the mechanisms of resistance to antifungals and antibacterials is necessarily limited by several factors defined in the review, a correlation between the two exists. For example, modification of enzymes which serve as targets for antimicrobial action and the involvement of membrane pumps in the extrusion of drugs are well characterized in both the eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsBacteriaCell WallFlucytosineHumansMiconazoleNaphthalenesTerbinafineAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFlucytosineMiconazoleNaphthalenesTerbinafine

Identifiers

PMID10515900
PMCPMC88922
OpenAlexW2144149632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.