Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10514021›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1999

Risks and benefits of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal breast cancer.

L B Michaud, A U Buzdar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Recent Advances in Therapeutic Potential of Dual-Acting Aromatase/COX-2.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. The crosstalk between ubiquitination and endocrine therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L B MichaudDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
A U Buzdar
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors were first reported in the early 1970s and have been used to treat breast cancer since that time. Until recently, essentially the only agent available in this class was aminoglutethimide, a nonspecific inhibitor with multiple adverse effects and drug interactions. Selective and potent aromatase inhibitors are now available (formestane, exemestane, fadrozole, anastrozole and letrozole), and we review the risks and benefits of these agents in order to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions. Formestane is an injectable steroidal aromatase inhibitor with significant activity against metastatic breast cancer. It has been shown to have similar efficacy and superior tolerability compared with megestrol, and is similar to tamoxifen in the metastatic setting. Exemestane is an oral steroidal aromatase inhibitor. It has been shown to be effective third-line therapy after tamoxifen and megestrol in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer. All the nonsteroidal (imidazole/triazole) aromatase inhibitors are orally available. Fadrozole has similar activity to megestrol and tamoxifen in the setting of metastasis, but has been shown in phase II trials to inhibit cortisol and aldosterone production. Anastrozole and letrozole have similar toxicity profiles. Compared with megestrol, anastrozole improves overall survival and has superior tolerability. Letrozole is superior to megestrol and aminoglutethimide in terms of overall survival and time to progression, and is also better tolerated. Although there is a strong rationale for using these agents in the treatment of breast cancer, the information presently available is insufficient to recommend any one agent over another. Direct comparative studies are lacking, and comparing agents across studies is limited by many biases and may not be valid. Formestane is only available as an injection and exemestane is not commercially available in many countries, making these agents more difficult to recommend over the other 3 agents. Fadrozole is less potent and less selective in inhibiting aromatase than letrozole. The efficacies of fadrozole, megestrol and tamoxifen appear to be similar; however, comparative data show no advantage of fadrozole over letrozole. Anastrozole and letrozole are generally considered to be similar agents. The clinical future of the selective aromatase inhibitors is promising, and these agents may change the way postmenopausal breast cancer is treated at all stages of the disease.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsAdjuvants, PharmaceuticBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansPostmenopauseRisk AssessmentAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAromatase InhibitorsEnzyme Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID10514021
OpenAlexW2065475055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.