Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10514020›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1999

Risk-benefit assessment of opioids in chronic noncancer pain.

B Bannwarth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Hybrid Statistical and Mechanistic Mathematical Model Guides Mobile Health Intervention for Chronic Pain.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Chronic non-cancer pain and opioid dependence.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2004
    Review
  11. Pain management in older adults.Current psychiatry reports · 2003
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 3 countries.

B BannwarthDepartment of Rheumatology, Pellegrin Hospital, Victor Segalen University, Bordeaux, France. bernard.bannwarth@u-bordeaux2.fr
Victor (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioids have been accepted as appropriate treatment for acute and cancer pain, but their role in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain is the subject of much debate, mainly due to concerns about waning efficacy, the potential for neuropsychological impairment and the development of drug addiction. Controlled clinical trials demonstrated that opioids may be effective in both nociceptive and neuropathic noncancer pain, although the former responded more consistently than the latter. Gastrointestinal and CNS adverse effects were frequent in most studies. Observational studies have generated contradictory findings regarding efficacy and safety as well as the risk of drug addiction in patients with chronic noncancer pain receiving long term opioid therapy. However, they suggest that opioids may be effective in individual cases, whichever the pathophysiological mechanism of pain. Taken together, the available data indicate that the outcomes associated with opioid therapy vary markedly across patients experiencing chronic nonmalignant pain. The main consensus is that a subset of these patients may gain substantial benefit from opioid analgesics without requiring rapidly escalating doses or developing intolerable adverse effects or drug addiction. Prescribing guidelines have been developed to assist practitioners in selecting the appropriate patients and ensuring an acceptable risk : benefit ratio of opioid therapy. Finally, it must be emphasised that chronic pain is a complex entity wherein analgesics, including opioids, are only part of the treatment.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticClinical Trials as TopicHumansNarcoticsPainPolypharmacyRisk AssessmentSubstance-Related DisordersTime FactorsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID10514020
OpenAlexW2033766978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.