Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10514018›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1999

Antioxidant vitamin supplements: update of their potential benefits and possible risks.

S R Maxwell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer: myth or reality?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S R MaxwellClinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidative damage to biological structures has been implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease and cancer, the 2 most common causes of death in developed countries. This has stimulated interest in the possible role of natural antioxidant vitamins in preventing the development of these diseases. Epidemiological studies have offered support for the notion that high blood concentrations or dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins may have a protective effect. On the basis of these findings and powerful marketing strategies, many healthy members of the population are now voluntarily consuming antioxidant supplements. A number of long term, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trials examining the protective effect of antioxidant supplements have now been completed. Their results have been generally disappointing and have provided little evidence of efficacy. Of greater concern, they have unexpectedly raised concerns that antioxidants, notably betacarotene, might increase the rate of development of cancers in high risk individuals. For this reason regular consumption of antioxidant vitamins supplements cannot yet be advocated as a healthy lifestyle trait.

Indexed as

Antioxidantsbeta CaroteneCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicDietary SupplementsHumansNeoplasmsVitaminsAntioxidantsbeta CaroteneVitamins

Identifiers

PMID10514018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.