ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1999
Trends in the prevalence and treatment of hypertension in Halifax County from 1985 to 1995.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ups and downs of hypertension control in Canada: critical factors and lessons learned.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Diagnosed hypertension in Canada: incidence, prevalence and associated mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012Article
- Characteristics of hypertensive Canadians not receiving drug therapy.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2008Article
- Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension in primary care: gaps, trends, and opportunities.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007Article
- Drug expenditure trends in the Canadian provinces: magnitude and causes from 1998 to 2004.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2005Article
- Hypertension control: results from the Diabetes Care Program of Nova Scotia registry and impact of changing clinical practice guidelines.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2005Article
- Treatment and blood pressure control in isolated systolic hypertension vs diastolic hypertension in primary care.Journal of human hypertension · 2003Article
- The 2001 Canadian hypertension recommendations: take-home messages.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002Article
- The management of hypertension in Canada: a review of current guidelines, their shortcomings and implications for the future.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to document changes in the prevalence and treatment of hypertension in Halifax County from 1985 to 1995 in an effort to observe, at the population level, the consequences of the availability of new antihypertensive medications.
methodsThe study population comprised a random sample of Halifax County residents, aged 25-64 years, who responded to the 1985 and 1995 surveys of the Halifax County MONICA Project and residents who responded to the Nova Scotia Health Survey conducted in 1995. Data from the two 1995 surveys were pooled. Information on hypertension awareness and use of medication were obtained through questionnaires, and blood pressure was measured according to a standard protocol, using phase I and V of Korotkoff sounds as respective markers for systolic and diastolic pressures. Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as a systolic pressure of 140 mm Hg or greater and a diastolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater. Changes in the prevalence of hypertension, prescribing trends and medication costs were examined, and the association between the type of antihypertensive treatment and characteristics of the respondents with self-reported hypertension was investigated by multivariate logistic regression.
resultsOf the 917 people interviewed in 1985 and the 1338 in 1995, 274 (29.9%) and 356 (26.6%), respectively, reported a history of hypertension. When age was controlled for, the proportion of respondents reporting hypertension did not differ between survey years or between men and women. The proportion of treated respondents who had uncontrolled hypertension increased between 1985 and 1995, from 32.6% to 57.4% among men and from 38.0% to 42.6% among women. An increase was seen in the use of calcium-channel blockers (from 2.1% to 19.7%) and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (from 5.2% to 25.4%); the proportion of patients receiving combination therapy or diuretics decreased (from 39.6% to 15.6% and from 31.3% to 17.2% respectively). These changes were associated with an increase in the average daily cost of medication from $0.48 to $0.85 per patient.
interpretationThe shift to new antihypertensive drugs was not associated with improved blood pressure control, but it was associated with an increase in average medication costs per patient. Uncontrolled hypertension remains a public health problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10513276PMC1230618W1906687502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.