Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10512849›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1999

Adhesion-induced receptor segregation and adhesion plaque formation: A model membrane study.

A Kloboucek, A Behrisch, J Faix, E Sackmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The equilibria of vesicles adhered to substrates by short-ranged potentials.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Entropy-driven aggregation of adhesion sites of supported membranes.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Supported double membranes.Journal of structural biology · 2009
    Article
  17. Quantification of nano-scale intermembrane contact areas by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A KloboucekPhysik Department, E22 (Biophysical Laboratory), Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Strasse, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
A Behrisch
J Faix
E Sackmann
Technical University of Munich · DEMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A model system to study the control of cell adhesion by receptor-mediated specific forces, universal interactions, and membrane elasticity is established. The plasma membrane is mimicked by reconstitution of homophilic receptor proteins into solid supported membranes and, together with lipopolymers, into giant vesicles with the polymers forming an artificial glycocalix. The homophilic cell adhesion molecule contact site A, a lipid-anchored glycoprotein from cells of the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum, is used as receptor. The success of the reconstitution, the structure and the dynamics of the model membranes are studied by various techniques including film balance techniques, micro fluorescence, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, electron microscopy, and phase contrast microscopy. The interaction of the functionalized giant vesicles with the supported bilayer is studied by reflection interference contrast microscopy, and the adhesion strength is evaluated quantitatively by a recently developed technique. At low receptor concentrations adhesion-induced receptor segregation in the membranes leads to decomposition of the contact zone between membranes into domains of strong (receptor-mediated) adhesion and regions of weak adhesion while continuous zones of strong adhesion form at high receptor densities. The adhesion strengths (measured in terms of the spreading pressure S) of the various states of adhesion are obtained locally by analysis of the vesicle contour near the contact line in terms of elastic boundary conditions of adhesion: the balance of tensions and moments. The spreading pressure of the weak adhesion zones is S approximately 10(-9) J/m(2) and is determined by the interplay of gravitation and undulation forces whereas the spreading pressure of the tight adhesion domains is of the order S approximately 10(-6) J/m(2).

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionMembranes, ArtificialProtozoan ProteinsAdsorptionAnimalsCell Adhesion MoleculesCell MembraneDetergentsDiffusionElasticityFluorescenceGlassGlycocalyxLectinsLightMicroscopy, Electron1,2-dimyristoylphosphatidylethanolamineCell Adhesion Moleculescell cohesion molecule, DictyosteliumDetergentsLectinsMembranes, ArtificialPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesProtozoan ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID10512849
PMCPMC1300510
OpenAlexW1992382028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.