Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10512817›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1999

Cooperative block of the plant endomembrane ion channel by ruthenium red.

I I Pottosin, O R Dobrovinskaya, J Muñiz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pharmacological Strategies for Manipulating Plant CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I I PottosinCentro Universitario de Investigaciones Biomedicas, Universidad de Colima, 28047 Colima, México. pottisin@cgic.ucol.mx
O R Dobrovinskaya
J Muñiz
Universidad de Colima · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effects of ruthenium red (RR) on the slow Ca(2+)-activated Ca(2+)-permeable vacuolar channel have been studied by patch-clamp technique. Applied to the cytosolic side of isolated membrane patches, RR at concentrations of 0.1-5 microM produced two distinct effects on single channel kinetics, long lasting closures and a flickering block of the open state. The first effect was largely irreversible, whereas the second one could be washed out. The extent of flickering block steeply increased (zdelta = approximately 1.35) with the increase of cytosol-positive voltage, dragging RR into the channel pore. At least two RR ions are involved in the block according to Hill coefficient n = approximately 1.30 for the dose response curves. The on-rate rate of the drug binding linearly depended on the RR concentration, implying that one RR ion already plugged the pore. The blocked state was further stabilized by binding of the second RR. This stabilization was in excess of that predicted by independent binding as the dependence of unblocking rate on RR concentration revealed. A cooperative model was therefore employed to describe the kinetic behavior of RR binding. At zero voltage the half-blocking RR concentration of 36 microM and the bimolecular on-rate constant of 1.8 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1) were estimated.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsChenopodiaceaeDose-Response Relationship, DrugIntracellular MembranesIon Channel GatingIonsKineticsMembrane PotentialsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRuthenium RedVacuolesCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsIonsRuthenium Red

Identifiers

PMID10512817
PMCPMC1300478
OpenAlexW1990438266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.