Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10511563›Full record

ArticleGenetics1999

DNA sequence variation and the recombinational landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a study of the second chromosome.

M T Hamblin, C F Aquadro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M T HamblinSection of Genetics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. mhamblin@genetics.uchicago.edu
C F Aquadro

Funding

MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERR01GM036431 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI AQUADRO, CHARLES F · 1986 to 2010
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between rates of recombination and DNA sequence polymorphism was analyzed for the second chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. We constructed integrated genetic and physical maps of this chromosome using molecular markers at 10 loci spanning most of its physical length. The total length of the map was 128.2 cM, almost twice that of the homologous chromosome arm (3R) in D. melanogaster. There appears to be very little centromeric suppression of recombination, and rates of recombination are quite uniform across most of the chromosome. Levels of sequence variation (theta(W), based on the number of segregating sites) at seven loci (tropomyosin 1, Rhodopsin 3, Rhodopsin 1, bicoid, Xanthine dehydrogenase, Myosin light chain 1, and ribosomal protein 49) varied from 0.0036 to 0.0167. Generally consistent with earlier studies, the average estimate of theta(W) at total sites is 1.5-fold higher than that in D. melanogaster, while average theta(W) at silent sites is almost 3-fold higher. These estimates of variation were analyzed in the context of a background selection model under the same parameters of mutation rate and selection as have been proposed for D. melanogaster. It is likely that a significant fraction of the higher level of sequence variation in D. pseudoobscura can be explained by differences in regional rates of recombination rather than a larger species-level effective population size. However, the distribution of variation among synonymous, nonsynonymous, and noncoding sites appears to be quite different between the species, making direct comparisons of neutral variation, and hence inferences about effective population size, difficult. Tajima's D statistics for 6 out of the 7 loci surveyed are negative, suggesting that D. pseudoobscura may have experienced a rapid population expansion in the recent past or, alternatively, that slightly deleterious mutations constitute an important component of standing variation in this species.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic VariationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceCrosses, GeneticDNADrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic MarkersMaleRestriction MappingDNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID10511563
PMCPMC1460763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.