ArticleGenetics1999
DNA sequence variation and the recombinational landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a study of the second chromosome.
Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- A population genomic resource for Drosophila pseudoobscura.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- A high-resolution crossover landscape in Drosophila santomea reveals rapid and concerted evolution of multiple properties of crossing over control.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Positive Selection and Functional Divergence at Meiosis Genes That Mediate Crossing Over Across theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Recent selection on the Y-to-dot translocation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Molecular population genetics of inversion breakpoint regions in Drosophila pseudoobscura.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2013Article
- Fine-scale heterogeneity in crossover rate in the garnet-scalloped region of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.Genetics · 2013Article
- Review
- Odorant receptor (Or) genes: polymorphism and divergence in the D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura lineages.PloS one · 2010Article
- A recombination survey using microsatellites: the O chromosome of Drosophila subobscura.Genetica · 2010Article
- Estimation of fine-scale recombination intensity variation in the white-echinus interval of D. melanogaster.Journal of molecular evolution · 2009Article
- Nucleotide polymorphism and within-gene recombination in Daphnia magna and D. pulex, two cyclical parthenogens.Genetics · 2009Article
- Advances in maize genomics and their value for enhancing genetic gains from breeding.International journal of plant genomics · 2009Article
- Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Divergence between the Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis genome sequences in relation to chromosomal inversions.Genetics · 2007Article
- Article
- Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.Genetics · 2005Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between rates of recombination and DNA sequence polymorphism was analyzed for the second chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. We constructed integrated genetic and physical maps of this chromosome using molecular markers at 10 loci spanning most of its physical length. The total length of the map was 128.2 cM, almost twice that of the homologous chromosome arm (3R) in D. melanogaster. There appears to be very little centromeric suppression of recombination, and rates of recombination are quite uniform across most of the chromosome. Levels of sequence variation (theta(W), based on the number of segregating sites) at seven loci (tropomyosin 1, Rhodopsin 3, Rhodopsin 1, bicoid, Xanthine dehydrogenase, Myosin light chain 1, and ribosomal protein 49) varied from 0.0036 to 0.0167. Generally consistent with earlier studies, the average estimate of theta(W) at total sites is 1.5-fold higher than that in D. melanogaster, while average theta(W) at silent sites is almost 3-fold higher. These estimates of variation were analyzed in the context of a background selection model under the same parameters of mutation rate and selection as have been proposed for D. melanogaster. It is likely that a significant fraction of the higher level of sequence variation in D. pseudoobscura can be explained by differences in regional rates of recombination rather than a larger species-level effective population size. However, the distribution of variation among synonymous, nonsynonymous, and noncoding sites appears to be quite different between the species, making direct comparisons of neutral variation, and hence inferences about effective population size, difficult. Tajima's D statistics for 6 out of the 7 loci surveyed are negative, suggesting that D. pseudoobscura may have experienced a rapid population expansion in the recent past or, alternatively, that slightly deleterious mutations constitute an important component of standing variation in this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.