Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10511538›Full record

ArticleGenetics1999

Molecular evolution of the Escherichia coli chromosome. V. Recombination patterns among strains of diverse origin.

R Milkman, E A Raleigh, M McKane, D Cryderman, P Bilodeau, K McWeeny

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recombinant transfer in the basic genome of Escherichia coli.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2010
    Review
  10. Population genomics and the bacterial species concept.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Genome dynamics in a natural archaeal population.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Helicobacter pylori genetic diversity and risk of human disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2001
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R MilkmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1324, USA. roger-milkman.uiowa.edu
E A Raleigh
M McKane
D Cryderman
P Bilodeau
K McWeeny
University of Iowa · USAbbott Fund · USNew England Biolabs (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporation patterns of donor DNA into recipient chromosomes following transduction or conjugation have been studied in the progeny of a variety of Escherichia coli crosses in which donor and recipient nucleotide sequences differ by 1-3%. Series of contiguous or variously spaced PCR fragments have been amplified from each recombinant chromosome and digested with a commercial restriction endonuclease previously shown to distinguish the respective parents in a given fragment. We conclude that entering donor DNA fragments are frequently abridged (cut and shortened) before incorporation, the cutting being due to restriction systems, and the shortening presumably due to exonuclease activity. Analysis of several backcrosses confirms, and extends to conjugation, the importance of restriction in E. coli recombination in nature. The transmission patterns in conjugation are similar to those of transduction, but (as expected) on a much larger scale. Asymmetric results of reciprocal crosses imply that mismatch frequency is not a major factor. Marked differences among the results of simple crosses according to parental strain combinations are consistent with observations that E. coli strains in nature vary dramatically in their restriction-modification systems.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRecombination, GeneticChromosomes, BacterialConjugation, GeneticCrosses, GeneticEscherichia coliGenetic TechniquesGenotypeModels, GeneticTransduction, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID10511538
PMCPMC1460788
OpenAlexW2118289316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.