Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10510441›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999

Cloning and preliminary pharmacological characterization of the anaphylatoxin C5a receptor in the rabbit.

D R Bachvarov, S Houle, M Bachvarova, J Bouthillier, S A St-Pierre, Y Fukuoka, J A Ember, F Marceau

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D R BachvarovCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Centre de recherche, Pavillon l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 11 Côte-du-Palais, Québec (Québec), G1R 2J6 Canada. dimchob@rsvs.ulaval.ca
S Houle
M Bachvarova
J Bouthillier
S A St-Pierre
Y Fukuoka
J A Ember
F Marceau
Hôtel-Dieu de Québec · CACentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CATohoku University · JPUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1 The rabbit receptor for C5a was cloned from a genomic library and found to be 79.5% identical to the human homologue, the highest degree of similarity found so far in nonprimate laboratory animals. 2 The rabbit C5a receptor stably expressed in RBL cells binds human 125I-C5a (2 nM). Unlabelled C5a and the C-terminal analogue N-acetyl-Tyr-Ser-Phe-Lys-Pro-Met-Pro-Leu-D-Ala-Arg (Ac-YSFKPMPLaR) were found to be competitors of that binding, the peptide analogue retaining approximately 0.1% of the affinity of human C5a. 3 The order of potency human C5a>Ac-YSFKPMPLaR was conserved in bioassays based on rabbits (relaxation of the isolated portal vein and pulmonary artery; acute in vivo neutropenia), but with a decreasing potency gap between the two compounds, a likely consequence of the resistance to peptidases of the analogue. 4 The molecular definition of the rabbit C5a receptor evidenced a high preservation degree of sequence and pharmacologic properties relative to the human ortholog receptor, thus defining a set of molecular tools for the investigation of the role of C5a in physiologic and pathologic models based on the rabbit (e.g. atherosclerosis, inflammation).

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, CDBase SequenceBinding, CompetitiveBlood VesselsCloning, MolecularComplement C5aHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataNeutrophilsRabbitsRadioligand AssayReceptor, Anaphylatoxin C5aReceptors, ComplementAntigens, CDComplement C5aReceptor, Anaphylatoxin C5aReceptors, ComplementRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10510441
PMCPMC1571653
OpenAlexW2126715513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.