Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10509173›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry1999

Duration of untreated psychosis in first-episode schizophrenia: marker or determinant of course?

T H McGlashan

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 374 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

T H McGlashanYale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural history of schizophrenia is often chronic and debilitating, an enduring fact that draws attention to the first episode and early course of the disorder when neurobiological deficits apparently form. Many recent studies have focused on the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) in first-episode patients for reasons that are reviewed here. DUP is often months or years in length, making it a major public mental health problem. Reducing DUP through early detection may be possible from a service systems perspective. This may be very important because earlier treatment not only reduces acute psychotic symptoms, but may also improve long-term prognosis by attenuating the deficit processes active at this time; processes that are either signaled by or a product of DUP. Finally, DUP appears to influence sampling in first-episode research in that longer DUP is associated with higher recruitment refusal rates to studies. For all of these reasons, DUP should be added to the battery of descriptive variables routinely collected on all patients with schizophrenia, whether for treatment or research.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyChronic DiseaseHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeuropsychological TestsPrognosisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID10509173
OpenAlexW2038344802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.