Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10505113›Full record

ArticleGene therapy1999

Photodynamic treatment of adenoviral vectors with visible light: an easy and convenient method for viral inactivation.

F H Schagen, A C Moor, S C Cheong, S J Cramer, H van Ormondt, A J van der Eb, T M Dubbelman, R C Hoeben

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inactivation ofBacteriophage · 2014
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F H SchagenDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
A C Moor
S C Cheong
S J Cramer
H van Ormondt
A J van der Eb
T M Dubbelman
R C Hoeben
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant adenovirus vectors are popular tools for gene transfer and gene therapy. However biosafety constraints require that all handling of the vectors and vector-containing samples is restricted to dedicated containment laboratories, unless they had undergone a validated virus-inactivation procedure, which decontaminates the samples from any active virus. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of photodynamic treatment (PDT) with visible light to inactivate recombinant adenovirus vectors in biological samples, with minimum associated effects on other biological activities. Several photosensitizers were tested for their capacity to inactivate a model human adenovirus vector, AdCMVLuc, upon illumination. Four photosensitizers (methylene blue (MB), rose bengal (RB), uroporphyrin (UP) and aluminum phthalocynine tetrasulphonate (AIPcS4)) could inactivate the adenovirus, as measured by expression of the luciferase reporter gene and by plaque assay. Of these, MB demonstrated to be the most effective sensitizer in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), giving > 7 log10 inactivation of the adenovirus. DNA isolated from MB- and light-treated virions was inefficient as a template for transcription. Furthermore, Southern blot analysis revealed fragmentation of the viral DNA. Based on its preference for DNA, MB is suited for adenovirus inactivation in blood plasma. Spiking experiments in which AdCMVLuc was added to plasma samples demonstrated a reduction (> 4 log10-fold) of reporter gene expression to almost background levels. In contrast to MB, photodynamic treatment with RB, UP or AIPcS4 did not lead to DNA damage. Although alterations of the viral capsid could not be detected, the binding pattern of the particles to target cells was significantly changed. Taken together, our data demonstrate that PDT is an efficient, convenient and useful method for the inactivation of adenovirus vectors in biological samples.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsLightAdenoviridaeDNA FragmentationDNA, ViralFeasibility StudiesGenetic TherapyHumansMethylene BlueMicroscopy, ElectronPhotosensitizing AgentsVirus ActivationDNA, ViralMethylene BluePhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID10505113
OpenAlexW2333997735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.