Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10498881›Full record

ReviewOncogene1999

Developmental defects and tumor predisposition in Rb mutant mice.

M Vooijs, A Berns

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Monitoring the Cell Cycle of Tumor Cells in Mouse Models of Human Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. E2f8 mediates tumor suppression in postnatal liver development.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. p21(Cip1) restrains pituitary tumor growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  18. Metastatic osteosarcoma induced by inactivation of Rb and p53 in the osteoblast lineage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M VooijsDivision of Molecular Genetics and Centre for Biomedical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A Berns
Cancer Genomics Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted gene disruption in the mouse germline permits the introduction of gene mutations similar to those found in inherited human diseases. New advances in gene targeting that enable cell type specific gene disruption in mice further increases the utility of mouse models to study genetic defects as found in cancer. Here we review the phenotypes observed in mice carrying germline mutated copies of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene. We will illustrate how methods that permit tissue-specific Rb inactivation in mice provide new and more versatile tools to gain insight into the etiology of sporadic cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, RetinoblastomaGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMice, Mutant StrainsMutationRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID10498881
OpenAlexW2086096251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.