ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999
Inhibition of heterologously expressed cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator Cl- channels by non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of sulfonylureas on diverse ion channels: an alternative explanation for the antidiabetic actions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Structural mechanisms of CFTR function and dysfunction.The Journal of general physiology · 2018Review
- Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator chloride channel blockers: Pharmacological, biophysical and physiological relevance.World journal of biological chemistry · 2014Review
- Loop diuretics are open-channel blockers of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator with distinct kinetics.British journal of pharmacology · 2014Article
- Locating a plausible binding site for an open-channel blocker, GlyH-101, in the pore of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.Molecular pharmacology · 2012Article
- Differential contribution of TM6 and TM12 to the pore of CFTR identified by three sulfonylurea-based blockers.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2012Article
- Divergent CFTR orthologs respond differently to the channel inhibitors CFTRinh-172, glibenclamide, and GlyH-101.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2012Article
- Direct sensing of intracellular pH by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl- channel.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009Article
- Time-dependent interactions of glibenclamide with CFTR: kinetically complex block of macroscopic currents.The Journal of membrane biology · 2004Article
- Steady-state interactions of glibenclamide with CFTR: evidence for multiple sites in the pore.The Journal of membrane biology · 2004Article
- Mechanism of lonidamine inhibition of the CFTR chloride channel.British journal of pharmacology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Hypoglycaemia-inducing sulphonylureas, such as glibenclamide, inhibit cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl- channels. In search of modulators of CFTR, we investigated the effects of the non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents meglitinide, repaglinide, and mitiglinide (KAD-1229) on CFTR Cl- channels in excised inside-out membrane patches from C127 cells expressing wild-type human CFTR. 2. When added to the intracellular solution, meglitinide and mitiglinide inhibited CFTR Cl- currents with half-maximal concentrations of 164+/-19 microM and 148+/-36 microM, respectively. However, repaglinide only weakly inhibited CFTR Cl- currents. 3. To understand better how non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents inhibit CFTR, we studied single channels. Channel blockade by both meglitinide and mitiglinide was characterized by flickery closures and a significant decrease in open probability (Po). In contrast, repaglinide was without effect on either channel gating or Po, but caused a small decrease in single-channel current amplitude. 4. Analysis of the dwell time distributions of single channels indicated that both meglitinide and mitiglinide greatly decreased the open time of CFTR. Mitiglinide-induced channel closures were about 3-fold longer than those of meglitinide. 5. Inhibition of CFTR by meglitinide and mitiglinide was voltage-dependent: at positive voltages channel blockade was relieved. 6. The data demonstrate that non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents inhibit CFTR. This indicates that these agents have a wider specificity of action than previously recognized. Like glibenclamide, non-sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents may inhibit CFTR by occluding the channel pore and preventing Cl- permeation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.