ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
Acknowledging the expertise of patients and their organisations.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02504502 (Enhancing Genomic Laboratory Reports to Enhance Communication and Empower Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing Genomic Laboratory Reports to Enhance Communication and Empower Patients
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Disease to Illness: Reframing Periodontitis Through an Anthropological Lens.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Review
- Moving towards a core measures set for patient safety in perioperative care: An e-Delphi consensus study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Building Research Initiatives by Developing Group Effort (BRIDGE): Patient-Partners in Aphasia Research.Seminars in speech and language · 2022Article
- Diabetes-related complications: Which research topics matter to diverse patients and caregivers?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- Understanding Partnerships With Patients/Clients in a Team Context Through Verbatim Theater.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2017Article
- Enhancing genomic laboratory reports from the patients' view: A qualitative analysis.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2015Article
- Talking about colds and flu: the lay diagnosis of two common illnesses among older British people.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2011Article
- Patient organizations in Finland: increasing numbers and great variation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
- Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
- Market failure, policy failure and other distortions in chronic disease markets.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- Library Outreach to Support Groups: A Case Study.Journal of hospital librarianship · 2009Article
- The experiential health information processing model: supporting collaborative web-based patient education.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2008Article
- Clients or citizens? Some considerations for primary care organisations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003Article
- The use of patients' stories by self-help groups: a survey of voluntary organizations in the UK on the register of the College of Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2000Article
- Voluntary organisations: from Cinderella to white knight?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.