ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1999
Helping patients access high quality health information.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- Arabic websites assessment of irritable bowel syndrome: How trustworthy are they? A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Automatic illness prediction system through speech.Computers & electrical engineering : an international journal · 2022Article
- Understanding Information Needs and Barriers to Accessing Health Information Across All Stages of Pregnancy: Systematic Review.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2022Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning to Personalize Web-Based Health Care Content.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- The more you know, the better you act? Institutional communication in Covid-19 crisis management.Technological forecasting and social change · 2021Article
- Assessing the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Seminars in ophthalmology · 2021Article
- The reporting checklist for public versions of guidelines: RIGHT-PVG.Implementation science : IS · 2021Review
- Therapeutic Duplication in Taiwan Hospitals for Patients With High Blood Pressure, Sugar, and Lipids: Evaluation With a Mobile Health Mapping Tool.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Patient perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and the role of general practice.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- The SDM 3 Circle Model: A Literature Synthesis and Adaptation for Shared Decision Making in the Hospital.Journal of hospital medicine · 2017Review
- High-quality Health Information Provision for Stroke Patients.Chinese medical journal · 2016Review
- What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? a phenomenological study.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2014Article
- Quality and readability of information materials for people with brain tumours and their families.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012Article
- Comparing the use of an online expert health network against common information sources to answer health questions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2012Review
- Chiropractic wellness on the web: the content and quality of information related to wellness and primary prevention on the Internet.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2011Article
- Online information needs of cancer patients and their organizations.Ecancermedicalscience · 2011Article
- Experiences and attitudes of Dutch rheumatologists and oncologists with regard to their patients' health-related Internet use.Clinical rheumatology · 2010Article
- An online network tool for quality information to answer questions about occupational safety and health: usability and applicability.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2010Article
- Patient information and education with modern media: the Spine Society of Europe Patient Line.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.