Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10487848›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology1999

Cloning and expression of the rat nephrin homolog.

H Ahola, S X Wang, P Luimula, M L Solin, L B Holzman, H Holthöfer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H AholaDivision of Bacteriology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
S X Wang
P Luimula
M L Solin
L B Holzman
H Holthöfer
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki Institute of Physics · FIMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite of the increased availability of genetically modified mouse strains, the experimental models in the rat have provided the most widely employed and versatile models for the study of renal pathophysiology and functional genetics. The identification of the human gene mutated in the congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (NPHS1) has recently been reported, and its protein product has been termed nephrin. Here we report the molecular cloning and characterization of rat nephrin cDNA. Rat nephrin cDNA has an open reading frame of 3705 bp, shows 82% sequence identity with human nephrin cDNA, and shows characteristic rat-specific splicing variants. The translated nucleotide sequence has 89% sequence identity at the amino acid level. The signal sequence, glycosylation, and cysteine localization patterns are nearly identical to those of human nephrin. As in the human, the rat nephrin transcript is expressed in a tissue-restricted pattern. Antipeptide antibodies raised to the intracellular nephrin-specific domain identified immunoreactivity exclusively within the rat kidney glomerulus by indirect immunofluorescence. Initial results with semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed a remarkable down-regulation of nephrin-specific mRNA in the puromycin nephrosis of the rat.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularProtein BiosynthesisAlternative SplicingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBlotting, NorthernDNA, ComplementaryDown-RegulationFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansKidney CortexMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMolecular Sequence DataNephrosisDNA, ComplementaryMembrane ProteinsnephrinProteinsPuromycin AminonucleosideRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID10487848
PMCPMC1866902
OpenAlexW2090807499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.