Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10487394›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1999

Changing prescribing in the light of tolerability concerns: how is this best achieved?

C S de Vries, C A Duggan, T F Tromp, L T de Jong-van den Berg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C S de VriesDepartment of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Centre for Pharmacy, Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration, The Netherlands.
C A Duggan
T F Tromp
L T de Jong-van den Berg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite our knowledge regarding the efficacy, tolerability and optimal use of drugs, suboptimal prescribing still occurs. In view of all the factors that influence prescribing, this is not surprising. The focus of drug tolerability has changed from 'choosing the best alternative' when a drug is prescribed, to a balanced decision incorporating various different treatments from separate healthcare providers. This article reviews strategies that may influence prescribing behaviour and discusses practical considerations for achieving optimal prescribing in view of tolerability concerns. The patient has a major influence on prescribing and, with the current diversification of healthcare, the patient now controls prescribing behaviour more than ever before. Communication between healthcare providers consequently assumes a vital role. If messages are to be coherent and transferable, it is increasingly important that healthcare workers communicate effectively with one another regarding patients, prescribing patterns, and drug tolerability issues.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug ToleranceHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.