ArticleGenetica1999
Expression of aphidicolin, FUdR and caffeine-induced fragile sites in lymphocytes of healthy Turkish individuals.
Article in Genetica, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expression of common fragile sites (c-fra) and frequency of chromosomal aberrations were studied in peripheral lymphocytes of 50 healthy Turkish individuals (26 males and 24 females from 1 to 87 years of age) after induction with aphidicolin (APC), 5'-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR), and caffeine. A correlation was seen between age and the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in APC and caffeine treated cultures, but there were no significant differences in the frequencies of chromosomal aberrations between males and females in any of the treatments. The mean frequency of aberrations induced by FUdR was significantly higher than that induced by APC and caffeine. A chromosome aberration is defined as a fragile site when present in 1% of the cells analyzed from each culture and in at least 50% of the individuals studied. Using these criteria, 12 c-fra were observed in the three treatments: 1p21, 1q21, 2p11-q11, 3p14, 4q31, 6q26, 7q22, 7q32, 8q24, 11q23, 16q23, and Xp22. Sites 3p14, 16q23, and Xp22 were the most frequently observed c-fra, with only the frequency of Xp22 being significantly increased in females in APC treated cultures. The results of these studies are important as a base against which the effects of other clastogenic and environmental agents, as well as genetic background, can be compared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.