ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1999
Differentiated effects on splanchnic homeostasis by selective and non-selective endothelin receptor antagonism in porcine endotoxaemia.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endothelin receptor A antagonism attenuates renal medullary blood flow impairment in endotoxemic pigs.PloS one · 2011Article
- The role of endothelium and endogenous vasoactive substances in sepsis.Hippokratia · 2010Article
- Effects of the novel selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, SB 234551, on the cardiovascular responses to endotoxaemia in conscious rats.British journal of pharmacology · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The non-selective endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist bosentan has been shown to restore systemic and gut oxygen delivery and reverse intestinal mucosal acidosis in porcine endotoxin shock. 2. To further elucidate the specific role of the ETA as opposed to the ETB receptor and their effects in the splanchnic region a non-selective (ET(MIX)ra) A-182086 and selective ETA (ET(A)ra) PD155080 and ETB (ET(B)ra) A-192621 receptor antagonists were administered, separately or simultaneously (ET(A+B)ra) 2 h after onset of endotoxin shock. These four groups were compared to a control group receiving only endotoxin and vehicle. 3. Thirty-nine pigs were anaesthetized and catheterized for measurement of central and regional haemodynamics. A tonometer in the distal ileum was used for measurement of mucosal PCO2. Blood gases and plasma ET-1-LI levels as well as histological samples from the gut were assessed. Intervention was started 2 h after onset of endotoxemia and the experiments were terminated after 5 h. 4. Endotoxin-induced changes in systemic, gut oxygen delivery and portal hepatic vascular resistance and systemic acidosis were effectively counteracted by both ET(A+B)ra an ET(MIX)ra. ET(A)ra administration was not effective while ET(B)ra proved to be fatal as all animals in this group died prior to full time of the experiment. While both ET(A+B)ra and ET(MIX)ra improved gut oxygen delivery only the latter attenuated the profound endotoxin-induced ileal mucosal acidosis. 5. The lethal effect seen from selective ETB receptor antagonism in the current study may be due to increased ETA receptor activity as plasma levels of ET-1 is increased several fold by blocking the ETB receptor and thereby the plasma-ET-1-clearing function. Furthermore, a loss of endothelial ETB receptor vasodilating properties may also have contributed to the lethal course in the ET(B)ra group. 6. The findings in this study suggest that ET is involved in the profound endotoxin-induced disturbances in splanchnic homeostasis in porcine endotoxaemia. Furthermore, antagonism of both ETA and ETB receptors is necessary to effectively counteract these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.