Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10482541›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1999

Repression of Epstein-Barr virus EBNA-1 gene transcription by pRb during restricted latency.

I K Ruf, J Sample

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I K RufProgram in Viral Oncogenesis and Tumor Immunology, Department of Virology and Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.
J Sample
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Regulation of Epstein Barr Virus PersistenceR01CA056639 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI SAMPLE, JEFFERY T · 1992 to 2006
$1.6M
TRAINING IN VIRAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007372 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI WEBSTER, ROBERT G. · 1991 to 2001
$310k
NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS CA56639NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R01 CA056639NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007372NIAID NIH HHS T32-AI07372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the restricted programs of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latency in EBV-associated tumors and a subpopulation of latently infected B cells in healthy EBV carriers, transcription of the EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) gene is mediated by the promoter Qp. Previously, two noncanonical E2F binding sites were identified within Qp. The role of E2F in the regulation of Qp, however, has been controversial and is undefined. Here we demonstrate that an E2F factor(s) within Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells binds to a G/C-rich element [GGCG(C/G)] within the previously identified binding sites in Qp and prototypical E2F response elements. Furthermore, Qp-driven reporter gene expression could be efficiently repressed through either E2F binding site by the tumor suppressor pRb, a potent transcriptional repressor targeted to promoters during G(0) and the early G(1) phase of the cell cycle via its interaction with E2F; a mutant pRb (pRb(706)) lacking E2F binding capability was unable to repress Qp. However, we did not observe cell cycle variation in the expression of either EBNA-1 mRNA or protein in exponentially growing BL cells, consistent with previous predictions that Qp is constitutively active in these cells and with the extremely long t(1/2) of EBNA-1. By contrast, within G(0)/G(1) in growth-arrested BL cells, EBNA-1 mRNA levels were twofold lower than in S phase, similar to the two- to eightfold differences in cell cycle expression of some cyclin mRNAs. Thus, although regulation of Qp is coupled to the cell cycle, this clearly has no impact on the level of EBNA-1 expressed in proliferating cells. We conclude, therefore, that the most important contribution of E2F to the regulation of Qp is to direct the pRb-mediated suppression of EBNA-1 expression within resting B cells, the principal reservoir of latent EBV. This would provide a means to restrict unneeded and potentially deleterious expression of EBNA-1 in a nonproliferating cell and to coordinate the activation of EBNA-1 expression necessary for EBV genome replication and maintenance upon reentry of the cell cycle in response to proliferative signals.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, ViralBase SequenceGenes, Tumor SuppressorHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMolecular Sequence DataRetinoblastoma ProteinTranscription, GeneticTumor Cells, CulturedVirus LatencyRetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID10482541
PMCPMC112808
OpenAlexW2156682639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.