Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10481117›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Therapy for microcirculatory disorders in severe acute pancreatitis: effectiveness of platelet-activating factor receptor blockade vs. endothelin receptor blockade.

T Foitzik, H G Hotz, G Eibl, B Hotz, M Kirchengast, H J Buhr

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T FoitzikDepartment of Surgery, Benjamin Franklin Medical Center, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
H G Hotz
G Eibl
B Hotz
M Kirchengast
H J Buhr
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the complications of severe acute pancreatitis are the result of the amplifying effects of microcirculatory disruption. The factors causing microcirculatory disorders in acute pancreatitis involve vasoactive mediators such as platelet-activating factor (PAF) and endothelin-1 (ET) activated during the inflammatory response to pancreatic injury. To further evaluate the potential therapeutic role of specific receptor antagonists (RA) to these mediators, the present study compares the effect of PAF and ET receptor blockade on microcirculation and organ function in a well-established rodent model of severe acute pancreatitis. Six hours after acute pancreatitis induction, rats were randomized to therapy with ET-RA (50 mg/kg LU-135252), PAF-RA (82 microg/kg WEB-2170), or NaCl 0.9% (volume equivalent). After 18 hours of fluid resuscitation, animals were relaparotomized for intravital microscopic determination of capillary blood flow, leukocyte rolling, and capillary permeability in the pancreas and colon. Other measurements included cardiorespiratory parameters, hematocrit, pleural effusions, ascites, urine production, and survival. Compared to saline treatment both ET-RA and PAF-RA significantly improved capillary blood flow in the pancreas and colon, reduced leukocyte rolling, and stabilized capillary permeability. The beneficial effects of receptor antagonist treatment on microcirculation were associated with decreased fluid loss into the third space, improved renal and respiratory function, and survival. Although both receptor antagonists likewise improved capillary blood flow, ET-RA was significantly more effective in counteracting leukocyte rolling and capillary leakage, thereby further reducing fluid sequestration. The present study confirms the beneficial effects of PAf and ET receptor blockade on microcirculation inside and outside the pancreas, organ function, and survival when given at the early stage of severe pancreatitis. Because ET-RA was more effective in stabilizing capillary permeability and avoiding subsequent fluid loss into the third space, we propose that ET-RA should be tested in a clinical trial (either in comparison or in addition to PAF-RA).

Indexed as

Endothelin Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAnimalsAscitesCapillariesCapillary PermeabilityChi-Square DistributionColonDisease Models, AnimalEndothelin-1Fluid TherapyHematocritLaparotomyLeukocytesMaleEndothelin-1Endothelin Receptor AntagonistsPlatelet Activating Factorplatelet activating factor receptorPlatelet Membrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID10481117
OpenAlexW2051558622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.