ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1999
Amplification of the Y chromosome in three murine tumor cell lines transformed in vivo by different human prostate cancers.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional and molecular cytogenetic analyses of three murine cancer cell lines that had been induced in male athymic mice by the injection of three different human prostate cancer cell lines revealed selective amplification of the Y chromosome. In particular, analysis of metaphase and interphase nuclei by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the mouse Y chromosome-specific DNA painting probe revealed the presence of various numbers of Y chromosomes, ranging from one to eight, with a large majority of nuclei showing two copies (46.5-60.1%). In Interphase nuclei, the Y chromosomes showed distinct morphology, allowing identification irrespective of whether the preparations were treated for 15 min or for 5 h with Colcemid, a chemical known to cause chromosome condensation. However, FISH performed on human lymphocyte cultures with chromosome-specific DNA painting probes other than the Y chromosome did not reveal condensed chromosome morphology in interphase nuclei even after 12 h of Colcemid treatment. Our FISH results indicate that (1) the Y chromosome is selectively amplified in all three cell lines; (2) the mouse Y chromosome number is comparable in both interphase and metaphase cells: (3) the Y chromosome number varies between one and eight, with a large majority of cells showing two or three copies in most interphase nuclei; (4) the condensation of the Y chromosome is not affected by the duration of Colcemid treatment but by its inherent DNA constitution; and (5) the number of copies of the Y chromosome is increased and retained not only in human prostate tumor cell lines but also in murine tumors induced by these prostate tumor cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.