Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10478802›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1999

Differentiation markers of mouse C2C12 and rat L6 myogenic cell lines and the effect of the differentiation medium.

G L Portiér, A G Benders, A Oosterhof, J H Veerkamp, T H van Kuppevelt

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A standardized herbal combination ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Heparan sulfate heterogeneity in skeletal muscle basal lamina: demonstration by phage display-derived antibodies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G L PortiérDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A G Benders
A Oosterhof
J H Veerkamp
T H van Kuppevelt
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differentiation grade of cells in culture is dependent on the composition of the culture medium. Two commonly used myogenic cell lines, mouse C2C12 and rat L6, usually differentiate at a low concentration of horse serum. In this study we compared the effect of horse serum with a medium containing a low percentage of Ultroser G and rat brain extract. The maturation grade was evaluated on the basis of various biochemical, (immuno)histochemical and cell-physiological parameters. Substitution of horse serum by Ultroser G and rat brain extract during the differentiation phase resulted in a higher maturation grade of the myotubes of both cell lines, on the basis of creatine kinase activity and the diameter of the myotubes. In addition, the C2C12 myotubes display cross-striation, contain a higher percentage of creatine kinase muscle-specific isoenzyme MM, show a ninefold increase in acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters, form a continuous basement membrane, and have a lower resting cytosolic Ca2+ concentration. L6 myotubes show a fivefold increase in AChR clusters and a twofold increase in the expression of the mRNA of the epsilon-subunit of AChR.C2C12 cells show spontaneous contraction and response of cytosolic Ca2+ to various stimulants in contrast to L6 cells which do not. These studies established that the Ultroser G/brain extract medium leads to a higher differentiation grade of both cell lines, but parameters appropriate for use as differentiation markers appear to differ between both cell lines.

Indexed as

Culture MediaAnimalsBlood ProteinsBlood SubstitutesCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineMiceMuscle, SkeletalOrganic ChemicalsRatsBlood ProteinsBlood SubstitutesCulture MediaOrganic ChemicalsUltroser G

Identifiers

PMID10478802
OpenAlexW1971270809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.