Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10478168›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1999

Elevated levels of serum creatinine: recommendations for management and referral.

D C Mendelssohn, B J Barrett, L M Brownscombe, J Ethier, D E Greenberg, S D Kanani, A Levin, E B Toffelmire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Necrotizing fasciitis: risk factors of mortality.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Progress and promise in the management of chronic kidney disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The economics of end-stage renal disease care in Canada: incentives and impact on delivery of care.International journal of health care finance and economics · 2007
    Review
  17. Natural history of elevated creatinine levels.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2006
    Article
  18. Why do family physicians fail to detect renal impairment?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2006
    Article
  19. Approach to managing elevated creatinine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2004
    Review
  20. Nephrology: 4. Strategies for the care of adults with chronic kidney disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D C MendelssohnCanadian Society of Nephrology, Ontario. dmendy@istar.ca
B J Barrett
L M Brownscombe
J Ethier
D E Greenberg
S D Kanani
A Levin
E B Toffelmire
Canadian Cardiovascular Society · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential benefits of earlier referral to a nephrologist of patients with elevated levels of serum creatinine include identifying and treating reversible causes of renal failure, slowing the rate of decline associated with progressive renal insufficiency, managing the coexisting conditions associated with chronic renal failure and facilitating efficient entry into dialysis programs for all patients who might benefit.

methodsA subcommittee of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, which included representatives from family practice and internal medicine, conducted a MEDLINE search for the period 1966 to 1998 using the key words referral and consultation, dialysis, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, renal replacement therapy and kidney diseases. Where published evidence was lacking, conclusions were reached by consensus. GUIDELINES: Earlier referral to nephrologists of patients with elevated creatinine levels is expected to lead to better health care outcomes and lower costs for both the patients and the health care system. All patients with newly discovered renal insufficiency (as evidenced by serum creatinine elevated to a level above the upper limit of the normal range of that laboratory, adjusted for age and height in children) must undergo investigations to determine the potential reversibility of disease, to evaluate the prognosis and to optimize planning of care. All patients with an established, progressive increase in serum creatinine level should be followed with a nephrologist. Adequate preparation for dialysis or transplantation (or both) requires at least 12 months of relatively frequent contact with a renal care team. Nephrologists should provide consultation in a timely manner for any patient with an elevated serum creatinine level. In addition, they should provide advice about what aspects of the condition require particularly urgent or emergency assessment. SPONSORS: This clinical practice guideline has been endorsed by the Canadian Society of Nephrology and the College of Family Physicians of Canada. Meeting, teleconference and travel expenses of the Referral Guideline Subcommittee were covered by The Momentum Program, a collaboration between Baxter Corp. and Janssen-Ortho Inc. However, the authors are solely responsible for the editorial content of this article.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationClinical ProtocolsCreatinineHumansKidney DiseasesKidney TransplantationPredictive Value of TestsRenal DialysisCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID10478168
PMCPMC1230545
OpenAlexW2158340932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.