ArticleGene therapy1999
Antigen-specific membrane fusion mediated by the haemagglutinin protein of influenza A virus: separation of attachment and fusion functions on different molecules.
Article in Gene therapy, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A single chain Fv antibody displayed on phage surface recognises conformational group-specific epitope of bluetongue virus.Journal of virological methods · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using genetic engineering techniques, two strategies for changing the receptor-binding specificity of the influenza A virus haemagglutinin (HA) protein whilst preserving its membrane fusion function, have been explored. The aim was to investigate whether the HA protein could be developed as an attachment/entry protein for targeting enveloped virus gene therapy vectors to specific cell populations. In the first strategy, a single chain antibody Fv region (scFv) specific for the hapten NIP was inserted between HA1 codons 139 and 145, to create a scFv-HA chimaeric protein. This protein was shown to possess anti-NIP binding activity, but membrane fusion activity could not be demonstrated. The possibility that linking the scFv domain directly to HA may have inhibited the HA fusion function led to the development of the second strategy. This involved separating the receptor-binding and membrane fusion functions of HA on to two different molecules. The feasibility of this strategy was tested by looking for fusion between NIP-conjugated red blood cells which lacked sialic acid (the HA protein's natural receptor) and Chinese hamster ovary cells that expressed both the above anti-NIP scFv-HA chimaeric protein (as a non-fusigenic, receptor-binding molecule) and wild-type HA protein (as a fusigenic, non-binding molecule) on their surface. Cell-to-cell fusion was observed in this system, indicating that the receptor-binding function of HA can be transferred to an adjacent molecule, and also changed in its specificity, without compromising its membrane fusion activity. This finding strongly suggests that the development of a two-molecule attachment and entry system for retargeting enveloped virus gene therapy vectors, based on HA, is a viable proposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.