Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10476210›Full record

ArticleGene therapy1999

Electropermeabilization of skeletal muscle enhances gene transfer in vivo.

I Mathiesen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 372 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Targeting Neurovascular Pathways: Gene Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Vascular Dementia After Stroke.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CORP: Gene delivery into murine skeletal muscle using in vivo electroporation.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

I MathiesenDepartment of Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work demonstrates that electrical muscle stimulation markedly increases the transfection efficiency of an intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA. In soleus or extensor digitorum longus muscles of adult rats the percentage of transfected fibers increased from about 1 to more than 10. The number of transfected fibers and the amount of foreign protein produced could be graded by varying the number or duration of the electrical pulses applied to the muscle. The stimulation had to be applied when DNA was present in the muscle. When dextran was injected together with the plasmid DNA, it was also taken up by the transfected fibers. Stimulation-induced membrane permeabilization and increased DNA uptake were therefore probably responsible for the improved transfection. The stimulation caused some muscle damage but the fibers regenerated rapidly. The described method, which is simple, efficient, and reproducible, should become valuable for basic research, gene therapy and DNA vaccination.

Indexed as

PlasmidsAnimalsbeta-GalactosidaseElectroporationGene ExpressionGenetic TherapyMaleMuscle, SkeletalRatsRats, WistarTransfectionVaccines, DNAbeta-GalactosidaseVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID10476210
OpenAlexW2033756314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.