ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1999
Immunohistochemical differentiation between primary adenocarcinomas of the ovary and ovarian metastases of colonic and breast origin. Comparison between a statistical and an intuitive approach.
Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case report: Metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinoma to the breast: diagnostic challenges and pitfalls.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Primary mucinous ovarian tumors vs. ovarian metastases from gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and biliary tree: a review of current problematics.Diagnostic pathology · 2021Review
- Ovarian metastasis from breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019Review
- Characteristics of breast metastases from non-breast solid tumors in 22 patients from a southern Chinese population.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- The pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of metastatic tumors to the ovary: a comprehensive review.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2017Review
- Differential expression of CK20, β-catenin, and MUC2/5AC/6 in Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer type X.BMC clinical pathology · 2017Article
- Metastasis of ovarian cancer to the breast: A report of two cases and a review of the literature.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Gene expression profiling in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: from translational research to standard of care.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2014Review
- Metastatic involvement of the spleen by endometrial adenocarcioma; a rare asylum for a common malignancy: a case report.BMC research notes · 2013Article
- Mucin 16 (cancer antigen 125) expression in human tissues and cell lines and correlation with clinical outcome in adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, esophagus, stomach, and colon.Human pathology · 2012Article
- Differentiating rectal carcinoma by an immunohistological analysis of carcinomas of pelvic organs based on the NCBI Literature Survey and the Human Protein Atlas database.Surgery today · 2012Review
- CDX2 as a marker for intestinal differentiation: Its utility and limitations.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2011Article
- Gene expression signatures differentiate ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma from breast carcinoma in effusions.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2011Article
- Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and tumor marker expression in non-small cell lung cancer.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2009Article
- Caecal metastasis from breast cancer presenting as intestinal obstruction.World journal of surgical oncology · 2008Article
- The histological diagnosis of metastases to the breast from extramammary malignancies.Journal of clinical pathology · 2007Review
- A specific cadherin phenotype may characterise the disseminating yet non-metastatic behaviour of pseudomyxoma peritonei.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
- Article
- [Breast metastases].Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2005Article
- The usefulness of CDX-2 for differentiating primary and metastatic ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study using a tissue microarray.Journal of Korean medical science · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo discriminate between adenocarcinomas that are primary to the ovary and metastatic to the ovary, especially of colonic and breast origin, by immunohistochemistry, using stepwise discriminant analysis or a decision tree.
methods312 routinely processed, formalin fixed tissue specimens were used. The tumours were divided into a learning set (n = 159), composed of primary tumours of ovary, breast, and colon, and a test set, comprising 134 metastases from these sites and an additional 19 primary ovarian carcinomas. The immunohistochemical panel was composed of antibodies against cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and 20 (CK20), CA125, vimentin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), and the oestrogen receptor (ER). The staining results of the tumours were expressed as the product of the staining intensity and the percentage of positive tumour cells. Analyses were first performed on the learning set and then evaluated on the test set.
resultsAlthough the immunostaining patterns showed a considerable overlap between the three types of adenocarcinoma, the breast carcinomas were typically positive for GCDFP-15 and often for ER, and negative for vimentin. Ovarian carcinomas were always positive for CK7 and to a lesser extent for CA125. Colonic carcinomas showed prominent positivity for CEA and CK20, while no staining was seen for ER and vimentin. In discriminant analysis, six antibodies (alpha CK7, alpha CK20, alpha CA125, alpha CEA, alpha ER, and alpha GCDFP-15) appeared to be necessary for optimal classification: 89% of the learning set and 82% of the test set were classified correctly. In the decision tree, only four antibodies (alpha CK7, alpha CEA, alpha ER, and alpha GCDFP-15) were used to obtain a correct classification score of 89% for the learning set and 84% for the test set.
conclusionsUsing a semiquantitative assessment of the immunostaining results by a restricted panel of six antibodies with stepwise discriminant analysis, 80-90% of the adenocarcinomas of colon, breast, and ovary can be correctly classified. Discriminant analysis is computer aided and therefore an easy method and for each case a probability value of the classification result is obtained. The intuitive decision tree method provides a slightly better result, requires only four antibodies, and offers a more practical method for the surgical pathologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.