ReviewClinical and experimental immunology1999
Regeneration of autotransplanted splenic fragments: basic immunological and clinical relevance.
Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spleen: Reparative Regeneration and Influence on Liver.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Critical mass of splenic autotransplant needed for the development of phagocytic activity in rats.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2012Article
- Mesenteric lymph nodes are not required for an intestinal immunoglobulin A response to oral cholera toxin.Immunology · 2010Article
- Article
- Plasma lipid levels of rats fed a diet containing pork fat as a source of lipids after splenic surgery.Lipids · 2009Article
- Effect of non-operative management (NOM) of splenic rupture versus splenectomy on the distribution of peripheral blood lymphocyte populations and cytokine production by T cells.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2007Article
- Antibody response of autogenous splenic tissue implanted in the abdominal cavity of mice.World journal of surgery · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.