Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10468300›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer1999

Molecular detection of tumour DNA in serum and peritoneal fluid from ovarian cancer patients.

K P Hickey, K P Boyle, H M Jepps, A C Andrew, E J Buxton, P A Burns

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Role of Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Cancers.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2015
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Epigenomics and ovarian carcinoma.Biomarkers in medicine · 2010
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K P HickeyDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Leeds General Infirmary, UK.
K P Boyle
H M Jepps
A C Andrew
E J Buxton
P A Burns
University of Leeds · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have analysed DNA extracted from the serum and peritoneal fluid of 20 ovarian cancer patients for the presence of tumour-specific genetic alterations. The 20 patients included six with stage Ia disease. Using six polymorphic microsatellite loci we were able to detect novel alleles or loss of heterozygosity in 17/20 serum samples and 12/19 peritoneal fluid samples. Tumour-specific abnormalities were detected in the serum of all but one of the stage Ia cases. Half of the occurrences of loss of heterozygosity identified in primary tumour material were detectable in the serum samples. Novel alleles indicative of microsatellite instability were found in 3/6 patients with stage Ia disease but in only 1/14 of patients with more advanced disease. One of the eight patients in the control group displayed abnormalities in her serum DNA. The ease with which tumour-specific alterations were detected in serum and peritoneal samples from ovarian cancer patients, using a panel of only six polymorphic microsatellite markers on four chromosomes, suggests that molecular detection methods could prove useful in the staging, monitoring and screening of this disease.

Indexed as

Loss of HeterozygosityMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesAscitic FluidBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionReference ValuesBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID10468300
PMCPMC2363116
OpenAlexW2016258565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.