Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10461876›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology1999

Hypothesis: for the worst and for the best, L1Hs retrotransposons actively participate in the evolution of the human centromeric alphoid sequences.

A M Laurent, J Puechberty, G Roizès

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Progressive proximal expansion of the primate X chromosome centromere.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  7. What's in a centromere?Genome biology · 2004
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M LaurentSéquences répétées et centromères humains, Institut de Génétique Humaine UPR 1142, Institut de Biologie, Montpellier, France.
J Puechberty
G Roizès
Institut de Génétique Humaine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of questions concerning the evolution and the function of the alpha satellite DNA sequences present at the centromere of all human chromosomes are still open. In this paper, we present data which could contribute to understanding these points. It is shown here that the alphoid sequences within which L1 elements are found are quite divergent from those of the homogeneous alphoid subsets present at each centromere where none has so far been detected. In addition, a number of L1s are detected close to the ends of the alpha satellite blocks. A fairly high proportion exhibit a polymorphism of presence/absence. Strikingly, several L1s localized at a distance from each other are always either present or absent simultaneously. This is interpreted as resulting from intrachromosomal recombination, through distant L1s, leading to deletion of several of them at once together with their surrounding alphoid sequences. The parameters determining which portion of the several megabases of alphoid sequences is actually involved in the centromeric function are not known. From the above data we suggest that the alpha satellite domain within which DNA sequences are recruited to form a centromere is both homogeneous in sequence and uninterrupted by L1s or any other retrotransposons. Conversely, non-centromere competent alphoid sequences would be both divergent and punctuated by scattered L1 elements, particularly at the borders of the alphoid blocks. On the grounds of these data and hypotheses, a model is presented in which it is postulated that accumulation of L1 insertions within a centromere competent alphoid domain is ruining this competence, the consequence being damage to or even loss of the centromere-forming capability of the chromosome. Restoration of fully centromere-forming competence is supposed to occur by two alternative means, either de-novo amplification of a homogeneous and uninterrupted alphoid domain or by unequal crossing over with a homologue harbouring a large competent one. If L1 retrotransposons are acting detrimentally to centromere integrity (for the worst), one must also consider them as having positive consequences on chromosomes by preventing their centromeres from swelling indefinitely by the addition of alphoid sequences (for the best). The data and ideas presented here fit well with those already put forward by Csink and Henikoff (1998) using the example of Drosophila.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRetroelementsBase SequenceCentromereChromosomes, Human, Pair 10Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4DNADNA, SatelliteHumansMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticDNADNA, SatelliteRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID10461876
OpenAlexW265525210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.