Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10461862›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1999

Myosin heavy chain profiles in regenerated fast and slow muscles innervated by the same motor nerve become nearly identical.

I Erzen, M Primc, C Janmot, E Cvetko, J Sketelj, A d'Albis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneity in the muscle satellite cell population.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2010
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Software for muscle fibre type classification and analysis.European journal of histochemistry : EJH
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

I ErzenInstitute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
M Primc
C Janmot
E Cvetko
J Sketelj
A d'Albis
Université Paris-Sud · FRInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasticity of mature muscles exposed to different activation patterns is limited, probably due to restricted adaptive range of their muscle fibres. In this study, we tested whether satellite cells derived from slow muscles can give rise to a normal fast muscle, if transplanted to the fast muscle bed. Marcaine-treated rat soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles were transplanted to the EDL muscle bed and innervated by the 'EDL' nerve. Six months later expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms was analysed by areal densities of fibres, binding specific monoclonal antibodies, and by SDS gel electrophoresis. Both regenerated muscles closely resembled each other. Their myosin heavy chain profiles were similar to those in fast muscles although they were not identical to that in the control EDL muscle. Since not even regenerated EDL was able to reach the myosin heavy chain isoform profile of mature EDL muscle, our experimental model did not permit studying the adaptive capacity of satellite cells in different muscles in its whole extent. However, the results favour the multipotential myoblast stem cell population in rat muscles and underline the importance of the extrinsic regulation of muscle phenotype.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMotor NeuronsMuscle Fibers, Fast-TwitchMuscle Fibers, Slow-TwitchMuscle, SkeletalMyosin Heavy ChainsMyosinsProtein IsoformsRatsRats, WistarRegenerationMyosin Heavy ChainsMyosinsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID10461862
OpenAlexW123117577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.