Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10457092›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1999

Adaptation of the odour-induced response in frog olfactory receptor cells.

J Reisert, H R Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Adaptive temporal processing of odor stimuli.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cilia- and Flagella-Associated Protein 69 Regulates Olfactory Transduction Kinetics in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Simultaneous Loss of NCKX4 and CNG Channel Desensitization Impairs Olfactory Sensitivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J ReisertPhysiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK. jr10022@hermes.cam.ac.uk
H R Matthews

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Receptor current and spiking responses were recorded simultaneously from isolated frog olfactory receptor cells using the suction pipette technique. Cells were stimulated with the odour cineole by rapid exchange of the solution bathing the olfactory cilia. 2. The receptor current response to a 1 s odour stimulus increased in a graded manner over a 300-fold range of odour concentration without clear saturation, and was accompanied by a train of action potentials. As the concentration of the odour stimulus increased, the frequency of firing increased also, until it saturated at the highest concentrations. The number of spikes evoked by the stimulus first increased and then decreased with increasing concentration, reaching a maximum at intermediate odour concentrations. The dose-response relation for spike firing rose at lower odour concentrations than the dose-response relation for the receptor current response. 3. Adaptation to steady odour stimuli was investigated by exposing the cilia to a 4 s odour pre-pulse and then to a 1 s odour test pulse. As the pre-pulse concentration was increased the dose-response relations derived from the receptor current and spiking responses shifted to higher absolute test pulse concentrations. However the number of spikes fired in response to a given test pulse was little affected by the pre-pulse until, at the highest pre-pulse concentrations spike firing was abolished despite the continued presence of a receptor current response. 4. The sensitivity of the receptor-current response to incremental stimuli fell with increasing pre-pulse concentration, declining with a limiting slope of 2.4 in double logarithmic co-ordinates. The sensitivity determined from the spiking responses declined to zero at a lower pre-pulse concentration, reflecting the abolition of spike firing at pre-pulse concentrations which still evoked a graded receptor-current response.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalOdorantsAnimalsElectrophysiologyKineticsRana temporariaReceptors, OdorantReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID10457092
PMCPMC2269541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.