Issues at the interface between primary and secondary care in the management of common respiratory disease. 3: Providing better asthma care: what is there left to do?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Proactive asthma care in childhood: general practice based randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
   Trial
2. Knowledge and Attitudes of GPs in Saxony-Anhalt concerning the Psychological Aspects of Bronchial Asthma: A Questionnaire Study.BioPsychoSocial medicine · 2010
   Article
3. History of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma: from opinion to control.Drugs · 2009
   Review
4. Inhaler devices for asthma: do we follow the guidelines?Archives of disease in childhood · 2002
   Article
5. Qualitative study of views of health professionals and patients on guided self management plans for asthma.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Asthma education.2000
• Commented on by
  Asthma care.2000

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as