Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10456377›Full record

ReviewDrug safety1999

Use of phenothiazines as sedatives in children: what are the risks?

K S Dyer, A D Woolf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K S DyerDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. dyer@bostonems.org
A D Woolf
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenothiazines have been widely used for their antiemetic, antipsychotic and sedative properties for many years. The introduction of alternative agents for paediatric sedation has led to the re-evaluation of phenothiazines as paediatric sedatives. Newer agents, such as fentanyl and midazolam, have short half-lives and reversal agents are available. Therefore these agents may offer comparable therapeutic efficacy with a better safety profile in young children. Reports of sudden infant death syndrome in children receiving a phenothiazine-containing syrup for symptoms of upper respiratory infection means that the outpatient use of these compounds in very young infants is not recommended.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolContraindicationsDrug InteractionsDrug OverdoseHumansHypnotics and SedativesNeuroleptic Malignant SyndromePhenothiazinesRisk FactorsHypnotics and SedativesPhenothiazines

Identifiers

PMID10456377
OpenAlexW2062493846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.